| Licensees : |
WILLIAM PITTS
age 60 in 1851
( also as Pitt ) |
1830 - 1858 |
| ROBERT PITTS |
1861 - 1865 |
| CHARLES CLAXTON |
1869 |
HENRY BENN
& pork butcher
& carrier |
1871 - 1900 |
HORACE ARTUR
( Henry Benn 81 years, retired and living here with his son in law ) |
1901 |
| WALTER
GIDDINGS |
September
1901
to 1903 |
|
Shown on Faden's 1797 map. At the Norfolk Quarter Sessions 17th April
1903 the appeal against a
Refused Licence was heard before Lord Lindley & other magistrates.
The licence of Walter Giddings had been first refused at the Hunstanton
Petty Sessions
and then again at adjourned meeting at Docking.
The case had again appeared at Hunstanton Court Of Appeal
where the application was refused.
Walter Giddings was subject to much legal activity.
He had been charged on 30th June 1902 of keeping his house
open at prohibited hours. ( Serving a man with 1/2 pint of beer,
outside his house at 10:30 am ) - Mr Giddings was fined 16 shillings with
4 shillings costs.
( He had advised the Setch brewery representative that he had been fined a
total of £1, which included costs and that the magistrates had said it
would have no effect on his licence. On that information the brewery had
allowed Giddings to continue at the house. )
On another occasion he had been charged with receiving stolen property,
( A turkey, purchased from a man he did not know - The case to be heard at
Kings Lynn Quarter Sessions later in April 1903. )
and another time, of serving a drink to a person who was already drunk.
The Court Of Appeal had said that they could not possibly say that
Giddings
was a man to whom a licence should be renewed.
The case against Giddings was so strong `and it was obvious that the
Police were telling the truth'
The Norwich Court refused the appeal without costs and with a recommendation
to the magistrates to facilitate and give effect to the application for
transfer if in their
judgment the facts and the law allowed. It was advised that Mr Giddings
could not apply for a new licence until the following February.
Lord Lindley ( His Lordship ) summed up by saying he did not like to
recommend what he could not carry out. The Court thought it rather hard on the
brewers, and if anything could be done to help them, so much the better.
|
|
The Lynn Advertiser
of 17th April 1903 carried the story of the appearance of Walter Giddings
before the magistrates for stealing or receiving a turkey knowing it
to have been stolen.
In the summing up Mr. North, his legal
rep, felt that the prisoner had been already cruelly punished, and urged
that the evidence of the prisoner and that of Mrs. Basham, had established
his innocence.
After a short deliberation, the jury returned a verdict of "not
guilty," and the prisoner was discharged. |